Does separate wires (three video and two audio) trump an HDMI. I'm going to get better cord. Which way should I go.
HDMI doesn't (by nature, or architecture) do anything any better than any other type of cable. If you're happy with the video and audio, then I'd say you're finished.
The HDMI was created to save the big companies from us little people from pirating their copyrighted content via "HDCP" (high definition content protection). In layman's terms, HDCP has the ability to make two perfectly good pieces of equipment not work with each other because they're different version of HDMI/HDCP and they won't "Handshake".
Having three RCA cables works just fine, because there's no "handshake" from a source component to the next component in the chain asking it if it has the ability to pirate what's being displayed.
All things being equal, you're fine. Of course he could have dorked up the installation by using RG-59 as opposed to RG-6 (but I doubt he even carries RG-59 on his truck anymore), or in any other countless ways a cable guy can halfass your cables. He could also have used the $0.99 red and white cables for your audio. Those are like the free ones you get when you buy a cheap DVD player.
How's the picture and audio quality compared to what it was?
Bob (HDMI hater)