@steve
Kindly do not misquote me. You just wrote ">>Hal doesn't believe you have to voice the electronics at all, which includes the amp"
I'm going to remain "kind" towards you, but only for so long. I've been messaged privately from folks on this forum having to do specifically with you and it didn't shed light on anything that I hadn't already surmised just by reading your posts. But if you are going to continue to intentionally misrepresent and misquote me in particular by name, then I am going to be private messaging moderators to ask that you be banned from this forum on the basis of intentionally lying, and promotion of defamation of character.
Thank you.
Hal
p.s. so you and others should be perfectly clear, and as I repeatedly agreed, an amplifier or any piece of electronics *does* have impact on the "voicing" of a system. However, if you look/read back on *all* of my posts here in this thread, you'll notice as to where I place that on the pecking order. It's very very far down after many other things. So yes, it matters. But in the grand scheme of things it matters like toenail fungus matters to the health of your entire body.
Best.
Hal
NO ONE GETS BANNED. We know how that works from the AudioSyndrome BS. We have no more Club. An Amp IMHO can have serious impact. The Amp/Speaker combo is a critical factor in synergy. Planars especially.
charles
Yes, Charles. An amp certainly can have a serious impact. AFTER the by far more serious impact that the following items have:
1 - your personal hearing acuity and distortion profile/preference
2 - the recording
3 - the room and environment
4- the speakers/transducers
NOW..... #5 the amp and other electronics.
Best.
Hal
Hi gdhal,
I am glad you posted, and we agree voicing is good for electronics. That is science if performed
correctly.
And no, I never misquoted you, but used what you stated as well as what you did not state,
page after page omissions, and attacks. The initial clue, you could have resolved the issue
right after I posted my post #28, If you really wanted peace. Instead it was argue just like
on Stereophile forums in 2009 when a group attempted to take over the entire forum.
All eventually left, by whatever means.
Your attempt at using a targeted link was already tried by one, from that group.
My computer expert verified such. That is why I posted screen shots.
John Atkinson, others and myself (the same group on other forums with Jneutron (FermiLab, and CERN) all dealt
with that group. They were also caught falsifying graphs, false data (28 pages) to discredit a 5 year work by
Dr. Kunchur on perception.
At ~28 pages, the peer reviewed, 3 national medical organizations, various universities, even atomic energy
brilliant minds information backround was presented.
That group all left one way or another in disgrace. I actually have some of John's emails to X member
and X's replies, attempting to bribe him. Fortunately, John has credibility/character.
I realize that you are not an engineer, but a computer scientist/programmer, so I tried to be
descent to you.
Wow, it is just difficult to figure how post #28 became #29, truly magical?
cheers
steve