In any conceivable world in which I might live (i.e. one in which I'm not overwhelmingly wealthy), the one piece I'd keep in my system is the Bolder modified squeezebox 2. I find the arrangement overwhelmingly convenient, and will never go back to using CDs if I can help it. And while there are other server arrangements availble, as far as I can tell they are all (reportedly) inferior, less convenient or much more expensive.
The strange thing is that I have far less emotional attachment to the SB2 that any other part of my system. It's strange to think about why I have this emotional attachment. It's clearly not an issue of performance. I'm pretty sure that the gear I have now performs well. But I just don't have enough audiophile experience to believe that the gear I have is exactly right for me.
But the gear I own means something to me, because it's all been such an early part of an exciting experience for me. I owned NAD entry level gear for years, but always knew I wanted more. And then I bought myfirst "audiophile" type gear. Of that first system, everything has now been sold except for the amplification. So now I have my second system. But it's the first system that has been built with any kind of philosophy or strategy behind it. My pre-amp is the first piece of tubed gear I've owned, and it's exciting to me. The speakers are the first single-driver speakers I've owned, and they're exciting to me. And my CIA chip-amp monoblocks were the first real amplifiers I bought, and have been the basis for what I've built now.
One day I imagine I'll move on from what I have now. I'll keep the SB2. But when I get rid of the other stuff, I'll feel like I've betrayed a bunch of friends.
Chad