My impressions to follow. Two pairs of Grover ICs with over 72 continuous hours of burn-in. My system, which used to be slightly to the cooler side, has vintage speakers and more current gear, in a dedicated listening room:
Odyssey Extreme Mono amps, VH cryoed Audio Flavor 4 PCs
Odyssey Tempest preamp, VH Audio cryoed Flavor 2 PC
Jolida JD-100 cdp, VH Audio cryoed Flavor 1 PC, Sylvania Gold Label JHS 5751WA tubes
Rega P25 with Denon DL103R cart, Pete Riggle VTAF
Tweaked Polk SDA 1C speakers with the improved RD1094-1 silk tweeters, a custom built A1 inter-speaker IC/interface, Groneberg Quattro speaker cables
Almost all components sit on heavy granite slabs, including the speakers. Exception is the TT, which rests on cones on marble on another set of cones on A.R.T. Q-dampers. Also have a piece of granite on the top of the JD-100.
Dedicated 20A lines: two duplexes handle the amps, pre, and TT. One duplex for the cdp.
All component (RCA, RCA connectors, PC male prongs, IEC prongs) are treated with Walker SST, including tube pins and Polk speaker external and internal connections. No SST yet on the Grover ICs.
The genres I've listened to include classical, alternative, rock, blues, opera, jazz. Lots of classical during the burn-in period.
Finding: Excellent detail retrieval across the board. Very good to excellent soundstage width, very good height, seems to have a bit less depth at the moment - soundstage is slightly pushed forward. Very good to excellent imaging, can pick out instrument location easily. SDA effect now on some material is past mindblowing, for example, try listening to Kruder Dorfmeister - The K&D Sessions; I put this to the excellent imaging and detail.
Haven't run too much of the TT yet, so don't want to do any reporting in that area outside of that I've liked what I've heard so far.
I know the Jolida isn't top of the line in cdps, yet I find it's easy to listen to and the Sylvanias make quite a bit of difference in giving a palpable 3D presentation and some midrange lushness. I think perhaps the player, the tubes, and my choice of PCs may be responsible partly for me not hearing a hot top end as some have reported. Is the top more present than before? Absolutely. Is this a negative? In my system with my gear to my ears - absolutely not. I note the bottom is more present than before, and I thought I previously had plenty of that; bottom end is decidedly more tuneful and impactful than it was previously. The mids seem well presented and have gobs of detail, well, there's tons of detail across the spectrum. Previously my system seemed to present female voices somewhat better than male voices, but now they each present equally well and better than before. Not sure why the male voices now are presenting as well as the female voices...
At this point in time, these ICs work more than nicely for me, and I'm hoping it stays that way. LKdog said, "They are quite stunning in their clarity." I'm finding this and more to be true. I'm sure the results of others will be system and preference dependent, as always YMMV.