AudioNervosa
Music Ward => Music Discussion => Topic started by: S Clark on April 08, 2023, 11:24:37 AM
-
Will the MQA ongoing bankruptcy \ reorganization affect anyone here?
-
This is old news and in my view no surprise. MQA is lossy. Why would anybody want that when lossless abounds?
Best
Hal
-
This is old news and in my view no surprise. MQA is lossy. Why would anybody want that when lossless abounds?
Best
Hal
I just saw it reported yesterday... and don't follow digital stuff anyway. However, it was just a year or two back that guys were loudly proclaiming it to be the be all and end all.
-
Not this guy... :thumb:
-
Never really had any interest in MQA as I’m mostly 16/44 anyway. Bit I am very surprised by the bankruptcy. Will read the article this afternoon.
-
Never really had any interest in MQA as I’m mostly 16/44 anyway. Bit I am very surprised by the bankruptcy. Will read the article this afternoon.
I'm surprised only in that it took this long. :)
You're golden at 16/44 anyway. 8)
Best
Hal
-
16/44 , if done correctly, can sound awesome!
Questions the need for MQA or Hi Rez
-
16/44 , if done correctly, can sound awesome!
Questions the need for MQA or Hi Rez
:thumb:
Indeed!
-
While it's true there is no "need" for anything greater than 16/44, I can tell you there is a "want". As in a marketable product.
MQA forget about. It's lossy and on that basis alone puts it out of contention.
But (lossless and uncompressed) high-res (defined as 24/96 or higher PCM, DXD or DSD) offers the best digital experience I've heard.
EDIT: and it's the high-res streaming, the latest crave, albeit compressed, where many audio folks are spending their cash. Even when folks are purchasing music to download (not streaming) they're presented with high-res options, at a higher cost...and folks are buying it.
Best.
Hal
-
https://www.soundandvision.com/content/tidal-adopting-hi-res-flac-hifi-plus-subscribers