IMHO, a fully functioning remote IS available in a number of different flavors. I'm sure from a marketing position, Logitech wanted to position the Touch as an SB3 replacement at essentially the same price. That it is and a whole lot more (well, assuming they ever actually release it
.
If you want a full function remote that will work with ANY of the Squeezebox products, there are lots of options including....
Logitech Controller
iPhone
iPod Touch
iPad
any laptop, desktop or netbook computer
Logitech could certainly have packaged the Touch with an equally robust remote but it would have significantly increased the cost. Or, they could have taken the Duet route and kept the Receiver and provided a substantially better Controller.
But, as an owner of both an SB3 and a Duet, I personally think the Touch is exactly what I want. Higher audiophile appeal than the SB3 or Duet, far lower cost than the Transporter. Personally, I want a display on the unit attached to my system and I want a high functioning remote. I most often use iPeng on my iPhone which makes for an excellent remote. My take on the CNET article is that the author is not a Squeezebox owner.